(22) Hentunen,A (2334) - Daly,C (2353) [A11]
BKK Open (4), 28.03.2007
[COLM DALY]



10.h4
This was easily the critical game of the tournament for me. I found myself in a very sharp line which I did not know and had to spend a lot of time working out how to play the position correctly just to survive the opening. Part of me was thinking I could be doomed here as it seems like there were so few options available, but on the other hand I just reasoned that I had done nothing wrong to deserve to be in trouble so early.

What developed was me finding my way out of the opening into an ending which, unknown to me at the time, had been played before as far as move 20 and is supposed to be better for White. While I dont doubt this may indeed be true, I think that from a practical point of view Black should be fine. In this game I was able to harrass White enough, and even gain an advantage that then became a winning position, only to make several blunders in my opponent`s time trouble just when I was sure that I was going to put him away. The game then went through a crazy phase in which we both made mistakes under mutual severe time pressure and then I threw it all away and even managed to lose.

It was a very very frustrating and painful loss and one I never really recovered from. I believe in momemtum and just knew that had I won here [as I clearly should have] then with with White in the next round and 3.5 out of 4 combined with my confidence riding high, anything might have been possible from the tournament. In this case, alas it was not to be and this game tormented me for long after it was over.

As if to underscore this view about timing and momentum, my opponent actually subsequently went on to make an IM norm with the same score as myself, additionaly underlining why people should never judge a performance just on points scored in an event, as it is often misleading. Here my 6 out of 9 being a real disappointment and not a good performance overall, whereas my opponents same score reflecting a far better result .

Though in the last round I was amused and somewhat puzzled to notice [along with many others] that a game close to me on a high board involving my opponent from round four was already over! At the time it had seemed very odd indeed as both players had plenty of reason to play for wins considering their standings and chance of winning a prize. I sort of knew there must be some explanation for this "Grandmaster Draw" but I only learned of what it was after the event.

I have to confess I am not, and never have been impressed with such cynical last round quickies. Here the result was known in a matter of minutes. I say this because by the time I had even arrived to play my own last round game, the game from a few boards away was already over. My disdain for such a practise in international chess as these short draws can perhaps be better understood by considering that my own game from the last round was the last of the event and was over 90 moves. It was a very satisfying win for me as it happens and well worth the effort. My fondness for long games is well known and evidence of this can be seen in that I also had the longest game at the 1998 Olympiad when I struggled on in vain to try win with a bishop and rook against a queen [with some pawns and no other pieces on the board] for 128 moves!

10...a6
[10...Bc2 Has been played 4 times and Black lost every time; 10...h6 Seems to be the main move but I felt it was passive and conformed too much to Whites whole plan. I figured it was better to be provocative and aggressive and cause White to have some doubts about the correct way the position should be played.; 10...Bd6 Perhaps the best move? Defense by development. ; 10...b5 I did consider this but just didnt believe it. I still dont!; 10...h5 Just looks bad too; 10...Qc7 Has actually been played, but only once and White won easily enough so I doubt it is any good.]

11.Nxd7 Qxd7 12.Qxd7+ Kxd7 13.h5 Be4
[13...Bc2 14.b3 (14.d3 d4 15.Kd2 dxc3+ 16.Kxc2 cxb2 17.Bxb2 Rc8+ 18.Kb3 Nxg4 19.Bf3 Nh6 20.Rac1 f6 21.Ka4 Rc7 22.Rhg1 Nf5 23.Rxc7+ Kxc7 24.e4 Ne7 25.e5 f5 26.Ba3 g6 27.Bd6+ Kc8 28.Rc1+ Nc6 29.Bxf8 Rxf8 30.Bxc6 bxc6 31.Rxc6+ Kb7 32.Rxe6 Rd8 33.Re7+ Kc6 34.Rxh7 gxh5 35.Rxh5 Rd4+ 36.Ka5 Rf4 37.d4 Kd5 38.Rh8 Rxd4 39.Rd8+ Kxe5 40.Rxd4 Kxd4 41.Kxa6 f4 42.a4 f3 43.a5 Kd3 44.Kb6 Ke2 45.a6 Kxf2 46.a7 Kg1 47.a8Q f2 48.Qg8+ Kh1 1/2-1/2 Mah,K-Middelburg,T/Millfield School 2002/CBM 089 ext) 14...Nxg4 15.d3 Rc8 16.Bd2 Ba3 17.Na4 Rc6 18.Ba5 b5 19.Nb6+ Ke7 20.Kd2 Rb8 21.f4 Bb2 22.Nxd5+ exd5 23.Bxd5 Rcc8 24.Bb4+ Kd7 25.Bxf7 Bxa1 26.Rxa1 Rb6 27.Rg1 Rf6 28.Bd5 Rxf4 29.Bf3 Rxb4 30.Bxg4+ Rxg4 31.Rxg4 Bb1 32.Rxg7+ Ke6 33.Rxh7 Bxa2 34.Rh6+ Kf5 35.b4 Ra8 36.Rb6 Bg8 37.e4+ Kg5 38.h6 Bh7 39.Ke3 Bg6 40.d4 Kxh6 41.e5 Kg5 42.d5 Rc8 43.Rxa6 Rc3+ 44.Ke2 Rc4 45.e6 Rxb4 46.d6 Kf4 47.d7 Rd4 48.Ra7 Bh5+ 49.Kf2 Rd2+ 50.Kg1 b4 51.e7 Rd1+ 52.Kf2 Rd2+ 53.Kg1 Rd1+ 54.Kf2 1/2-1/2 Chasovnikova,E-Savitskaya,E/Moscow 1997/EXT 2000]

14.f3 Bc2 15.g5! Ne8 16.d3 d4 17.Kd2 dxc3+ 18.Kxc2 cxb2 19.Bxb2
After the game I discovered that all this had been played before and it was only now that I deviated from previous play. I think my move is more accurate as it keeps the rook check in reserve and probes Whites position straight away and forces White to make some commitments.

19...h6
[19...Rc8+ 20.Kd1 h6 21.g6 f6 22.f4 Be7 23.e4 Nc7 24.a4 a5 25.Kd2 Bb4+ 26.Ke3 Na6 27.Rhc1 Nc5 28.Rc4 Nb3 29.Rd1 b6 30.Bf1 Rxc4 31.dxc4+ Ke7 32.c5 Bxc5+ 33.Kf3 Bd6 34.Bc4 Nc5 35.e5 fxe5 36.Rxd6 Kxd6 37.Bxe5+ Ke7 38.Bxg7 Rd8 39.Bxh6 Rd4 40.Bg5+ Kf8 41.h6 Rxc4 42.Bf6 Nd7 43.h7 Nxf6 44.h8Q+ Ng8 45.Qh7 Rc3+ 46.Ke2 1-0 Jobava,B-Wang Hao/Taiyuan CHN 2006/The Week in Chess 611]

20.f4
Now that the diagonal has been opened and the b7 pawn vulnerable I thought a check with the rook was appropiate.

20...Rc8+ 21.Kb3 Be7 22.g6 fxg6 23.hxg6 Rf8 24.Rhf1 Rf5!?
Active play seemed like the best way to prevent White from getting a cosy sort of position in which the two bishops could be put to good use.

25.a4 Bf6 26.d4 b5 27.a5 Rc4 28.Be4 Rh5 29.Bd3 Rh3 30.Rad1? Nd6 31.d5 Bxb2 32.dxe6+ Kxe6 33.Kxb2 Rb4+ 34.Kc3 Ra4 35.Ra1 Ne4+ 36.Kb2
The first critical moment in which Black can wrap things up with a winning sequence.

36...Rd4?!
[36...Rxa1! 37.Rxa1 Nc5 And Black is well on the way to a win.]

37.Rac1 Kd5
[37...Rh2! ]

38.Rc8 Nd6 39.Rg8 Nc4+ 40.Ka2 Rh2 41.Ka1 Kc5 42.Rd1
I cant be sure of the exact sequence of moves that followed as the pen I was using was faulty and I was in a big time scramble so the moves are hard to piece together. I was actually furious and instead of trying to write on the sheet provided just tried to write on the carbon copy directly but ended up with the moves barely ledigble half the time from the time scramble. Suffice to say that from here on in, things went quite crazy and after more ups and downs and blunders from both sides I ended up with a losing position and duly lost.

42...Nxa5 43.Kb2 Rxf4
[43...Ra4 44.Rxg7 Rb4+ 45.Kc3 Rxf4 Was maybe played ?; 43...Rd7! Was just winning for Black]

44.Rxg7 Rb4+ 45.Kc3 Ra4 46.Rg1 Rhh4 47.Kd2
And as I said earlier many more silly moves later and White duly won. 1-0